|
Post by Bevo on Jun 28, 2019 12:50:44 GMT
Also know as, "The Night, they burned old Biden down"....
It was sad to see. Joe should have stayed in retirement. He doesn't need this crap. They will completely destroy him before this is over. DO it NOW, Joe. Save yourself, and what family you have left from the embarrassment.
Otherwise, nothing particularly notable. Dems want to let ANYONE in the WORLD come here, and get FREE medical care... and, they want to put every person working for Anthem, Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Humana, or any other private insurance company OUT OF WORK.
What a "Winning" message..... not.
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Jun 28, 2019 13:42:05 GMT
I don't keep up with politics that much but agree with you, Bevo. Old Blue Hen (too old) Joe doesn't need this 'piling on' crap. I always thought Biden was their only hope of dumping Trump in 20 so they're messing up in that regard.
|
|
|
Post by EvilVodka on Jun 28, 2019 13:51:24 GMT
I don't keep up with politics that much but agree with you, Bevo. Old Blue Hen (too old) Joe doesn't need this 'piling on' crap. I always thought Biden was their only hope of dumping Trump in 20 so they're messing up in that regard. No, Biden has no chance...l wouldnt trust him to drive my car
|
|
|
Post by EvilVodka on Jun 28, 2019 14:00:01 GMT
Also know as, "The Night, they burned old Biden down"....
It was sad to see. Joe should have stayed in retirement. He doesn't need this crap. They will completely destroy him before this is over. DO it NOW, Joe. Save yourself, and what family you have left from the embarrassment.
Otherwise, nothing particularly notable. Dems want to let ANYONE in the WORLD come here, and get FREE medical care... and, they want to put every person working for Anthem, Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Humana, or any other private insurance company OUT OF WORK.
What a "Winning" message..... not. The disconnection with the majority of working America is jawdropping. Not just the candidates, but NBC as well This policy of open borders is so completely insane. Why doesn't corporate NBC focus on asking those douchebags from Cali how they plan to help the tent cities in LA? The democrats also talk as though the Russians hacked the 2016 election. They talk about it as fact. This is completely false garbage and then add in the Transgender garbage, and trying to grab guns...it is pure lala land I do agree with Bernie Sanders though....we need a revolution
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Jun 28, 2019 14:06:46 GMT
I don't keep up with politics that much but agree with you, Bevo. Old Blue Hen (too old) Joe doesn't need this 'piling on' crap. I always thought Biden was their only hope of dumping Trump in 20 so they're messing up in that regard. No, Biden has no chance...l wouldnt trust him to drive my car If Biden would have no chance, Evil, it wouldn't be because you, personally, wouldn't want him driving your car.
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Jun 28, 2019 14:10:26 GMT
"the biggest argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter"
|
|
|
Post by EvilVodka on Jun 28, 2019 14:13:20 GMT
No, Biden has no chance...l wouldnt trust him to drive my car If Biden would have no chance, Evil, it wouldn't be because you, personally, wouldn't want him driving your car. Ya, it would be because anyone under 50 wouldnt want him driving AT ALL Biden needs to retire, he has no business in decision making anymore
|
|
|
Post by jameshowell on Jun 28, 2019 14:22:10 GMT
The left will ensure Biden is not the nominee; the establishment dems will ensure that Bernie is not the nominee. After the debates, I think we can be assured that Beto is done. At this point, it "may" come down to Warren and Harris. Neither a northeast liberal nor a California liberal has a chance in any of the states Trump won, and they put Minnesota, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, New Hampshire, and New Mexico in play for Trump. If the economy keeps humming along, it may be a landslide in the electoral college. History is also on Trumps side. In over a hundred years, with the sole exception of Jimmy Carter, neither party has held the White House for less than eight years, the last three Presidents have been elected with very low approval ratings, Trumps ratings, although low by historical standards, are pretty much where they were on election day. And other than the aforementioned Carter, the only incumbent defeated in a two man race (Bush 41 would have been re-elected but for Perot), was Ford who was never elected in the first place and "may" have been the victim of voter fraud in Illinois. In any case, if one were a gambler, one would put their money on the re-election of DJT. Probably a status quo election with Trump being re-elected and the only Senate seat likely to change hands being Alabama. The House will swing back toward the GOP but hard to tell at this point which party will be the majority, likely to be very close to 50-50.
|
|
|
Post by jameshowell on Jun 28, 2019 14:22:59 GMT
How many dem political adds are going to feature the "my time is up" clip (out of context of course).
|
|
|
Post by jameshowell on Jun 28, 2019 14:27:26 GMT
We need to increase the number of representatives by 50% to 650 and increase the Senate to three per state. That would put a senator for every state on the ballot every two years, increasing voter interest. The house increase would vastly diminish the effects of gerrymandering. EC would also jump to 804 with the increase in senators and reps.
|
|
|
Post by EvilVodka on Jun 28, 2019 15:17:06 GMT
The left will ensure Biden is not the nominee; the establishment dems will ensure that Bernie is not the nominee. After the debates, I think we can be assured that Beto is done. At this point, it "may" come down to Warren and Harris. Neither a northeast liberal nor a California liberal has a chance in any of the states Trump won, and they put Minnesota, Virginia, Colorado, Nevada, New Hampshire, and New Mexico in play for Trump. If the economy keeps humming along, it may be a landslide in the electoral college. History is also on Trumps side. In over a hundred years, with the sole exception of Jimmy Carter, neither party has held the White House for less than eight years, the last three Presidents have been elected with very low approval ratings, Trumps ratings, although low by historical standards, are pretty much where they were on election day. And other than the aforementioned Carter, the only incumbent defeated in a two man race (Bush 41 would have been re-elected but for Perot), was Ford who was never elected in the first place and "may" have been the victim of voter fraud in Illinois. In any case, if one were a gambler, one would put their money on the re-election of DJT. Probably a status quo election with Trump being re-elected and the only Senate seat likely to change hands being Alabama. The House will swing back toward the GOP but hard to tell at this point which party will be the majority, likely to be very close to 50-50. I agree, and Trump will run circles around these people in debates the only candidate I find moderately interesting is Tulsi Gabbard. But the establishment heirchy hates her great quote by Abby Martin on Joe Rogan: "every (democratic) candidate is 50 shades of Hillary"
|
|
|
Post by EvilVodka on Jun 28, 2019 15:18:03 GMT
We need to increase the number of representatives by 50% to 650 and increase the Senate to three per state. That would put a senator for every state on the ballot every two years, increasing voter interest. The house increase would vastly diminish the effects of gerrymandering. EC would also jump to 804 with the increase in senators and reps. Interesting idea
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Jun 28, 2019 15:31:43 GMT
How many dem political adds are going to feature the "my time is up" clip (out of context of course). If I were designing an add for the GOP, I'd run Harris saying, 'Voters want to know how we're going to put food on their table'.
Umm..... NO Kamala. I want to know how you're going to help ME put food on MY table. I don't want food from you.
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Jun 28, 2019 15:34:33 GMT
We need to increase the number of representatives by 50% to 650 and increase the Senate to three per state. That would put a senator for every state on the ballot every two years, increasing voter interest. The house increase would vastly diminish the effects of gerrymandering. EC would also jump to 804 with the increase in senators and reps. Interesting... I've never heard a person with cockroaches suggest the answer to their problem was: MORE COCKROACHES.
But, you're correct about the Gerrymandering and the interest in elections. The Senate election cycle is weird. It creates imbalances between Presidents and the Party in control of the Senate.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Jul 2, 2019 23:50:56 GMT
I don't keep up with politics that much but agree with you, Bevo. Old Blue Hen (too old) Joe doesn't need this 'piling on' crap. I always thought Biden was their only hope of dumping Trump in 20 so they're messing up in that regard. No, Biden has no chance...l wouldnt trust him to drive my car Biden has been in DC 40+ years and NOW he's gonna fix it? Sit this one out Joe. Trump is running on his accomplishments, all of the rest are running on what they MIGHT accomplish....
|
|