|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Aug 14, 2023 3:09:26 GMT
Bevo my friend, it is not worth the effort. You could lay evidence on a silver platter and aufan would still not be able to process it. Keep in mind that this is the same guy that admitted to watching 2000 mules and it did not put any doubt in his mind that election fraud may have existed. aufan, you should watch Tuckers interview. If you can get through that without a shred of doubt that there were other actors involved on J6 then you are the ideal person that the liberals are counting on as they lead their sheep over the cliff. Oh, 2000 mules again? I thought you and Bevo dropped that subject when I asked a very common sense question: 60,000 hours of video, combined with geolocation time stamped data of the mules… and not one mule was caught on tape multiple times, even though that is the accusation. “Silver platter” This is why I keep coming back here. You all are hilariously entertaining. Please show the statement where either Bevo or I decided to drop it. There is a boat load of evidence that lead to potential corruption. One compelling piece was one mule who visited 6 so called non profits travelling through 6 counties and visiting over 20 drop boxes in a single evening. Your response to that since not a single person was seen on video twice it concludes no corruption occurred. Just another example that shows your inability to process data logically. |
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Aug 14, 2023 3:16:37 GMT
Oh, 2000 mules again? I thought you and Bevo dropped that subject when I asked a very common sense question: 60,000 hours of video, combined with geolocation time stamped data of the mules… and not one mule was caught on tape multiple times, even though that is the accusation. “Silver platter” This is why I keep coming back here. You all are hilariously entertaining. I haven’t dropped it. Just been pre-occupied with life. Video is hard to watch. It takes a human. The video quality was often poor. The mules very often wore masks, or face covers. There are more that 7 years worth of video to review. The phone location data can be analyzed by computer…. Ie: fast It’s conclusive data … even if you want to deny it. The routes stopped on election day. Picked up again in Georgia for the run-offs. Then, stopped again. It couldn’t be any plainer. The mechanism is plausible, and possible. How do we eliminate that chance in future elections? They can’t use time stamps? Crack research team! With the first surveillance video showed, they said “this particular individual we have in a number of different locations in a number of different times.” Yet they only showed one video of him. Not one repeat video of a mule in that 90 minute film. The one thing they were trying to prove and they can’t show one example of it, despite there being hundreds or thousands of mules. Also, hey never stated any analysis that the routes stopped on Election Day. In fact they did say they bought data from October 1st through Election Day, except for Georgia where they bought to Jan 6. They never made any indication that the routes stopped, nor did they share analysis on the routes before and after the election. You imagined or misremembered something from the movie while stating “It couldn’t be any plainer.” You’re better than this. |
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Aug 14, 2023 3:18:11 GMT
They Proud Boys had MANY FBI informants in their group. Many of them were among the most aggressive agitators on Jan 6. LEADING, not following and reporting back. Days after it happened, one of them posted on-line a comment saying “they were expecting to just let some in and make it LOOK like the worst thing in the world”. That raises no red flag in your mind? Why would anyone be planning for letting anyone in? Add this to the statements made by the Chief of the Capital police in Jan 6. You won’t hear what he had to say on regular media either. Or in the bogus Senate show trial. But, Tucker let him talk for an hour on his new Twitter show. This is the interview that Tucker was going to air the night he was suspended. It all points to people other than Trump. I finally understand! Your confusion is that you think the accusation against Trump and those on Jan 6 is that there was organized and intelligent strategy behind January 6th. Which is why you post things that claim Trump and his supporters weren't smart enough to plan Jan 6, like this post. Guess what - we agree! Trump gathered his supporters around and said: "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore". And they fought like hell under his suggestion. This was not a premeditated attack. There was no strategy in place. There was nothing pre-planned. Nothing to stop. Just idiots following an idiot. And they did idiotic things. Treasonous idiotic things, and they are being punished for doing idiotic things. I'm glad we agree on this. Trump and his supporters are idiots. Nobody is accusing them of being smart enough to plan events like Jan 6. Trump and the other idiots who participated in Jan 6 are accused and punished for being idiots, not for having plans.
Pretty interesting that you equate fight like hell means going into the capital and taking over the government. Yet you are incapable of comprehending that his actual word were to go to the capital peacefully and patriotically and let your voices heard. Just another example where your hatred for Trump makes you incapable of processing information in a reasonable manor. |
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Aug 14, 2023 3:45:48 GMT
Oh, 2000 mules again? I thought you and Bevo dropped that subject when I asked a very common sense question: 60,000 hours of video, combined with geolocation time stamped data of the mules… and not one mule was caught on tape multiple times, even though that is the accusation. “Silver platter” This is why I keep coming back here. You all are hilariously entertaining. Please show the statement where either Bevo or I decided to drop it. There is a boat load of evidence that lead to potential corruption. One compelling piece was one mule who visited 6 so called non profits travelling through 6 counties and visiting over 20 drop boxes in a single evening. Your response to that since not a single person was seen on video twice it concludes no corruption occurred. Just another example that shows your inability to process data logically. It concludes they have no real evidence. If they did they would have shown it. |
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Aug 14, 2023 4:36:11 GMT
I finally understand! Your confusion is that you think the accusation against Trump and those on Jan 6 is that there was organized and intelligent strategy behind January 6th. Which is why you post things that claim Trump and his supporters weren't smart enough to plan Jan 6, like this post. Guess what - we agree! Trump gathered his supporters around and said: "We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore". And they fought like hell under his suggestion. This was not a premeditated attack. There was no strategy in place. There was nothing pre-planned. Nothing to stop. Just idiots following an idiot. And they did idiotic things. Treasonous idiotic things, and they are being punished for doing idiotic things. I'm glad we agree on this. Trump and his supporters are idiots. Nobody is accusing them of being smart enough to plan events like Jan 6. Trump and the other idiots who participated in Jan 6 are accused and punished for being idiots, not for having plans.
Pretty interesting that you equate fight like hell means going into the capital and taking over the government. Yet you are incapable of comprehending that his actual word were to go to the capital peacefully and patriotically and let your voices heard. Just another example where your hatred for Trump makes you incapable of processing information in a reasonable manor. He said “fight like hell” and I’m supposed to interpret that as “peacefully”? And because I don’t, it’s Trump hatred? You make me laugh. |
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Aug 14, 2023 18:48:36 GMT
Pretty interesting that you equate fight like hell means going into the capital and taking over the government. Yet you are incapable of comprehending that his actual word were to go to the capital peacefully and patriotically and let your voices heard. Just another example where your hatred for Trump makes you incapable of processing information in a reasonable manor. He said “fight like hell” and I’m supposed to interpret that as “peacefully”? And because I don’t, it’s Trump hatred? You make me laugh. Obama told his supporter's to "bring a gun" to political debates. Should he have been prosecuted for the guy that shot up Republican softball players? I don't recall ever seeing a politician prosecuted for rhetoric. ONLY, the orange man... who, we all know is... "bad" |
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Aug 14, 2023 19:27:43 GMT
You imagined or misremembered something from the movie while stating “It couldn’t be any plainer.” You’re better than this. I didn't imagine or misremember. It was just from the actual source of the data, not the 2000 Mule movie. Frankly, I never watched the entire movie. Only a few clips. I'd already heard the underlying premise. rumble.com/v10ajh2-how-the-did-it-true-the-votes-catherine-engelbrecht-and-gregg-phillips-on-t.htmlDiscussion about this starts at the 45:00 mark. Watch the entire thing, if you can stomach it. IF what they say is true, to me, this is definitive proof of massive fraud. I don't see any other way to look at it. Of course, they announced their work a year ago, and no government agency seems interested in the slightest. So, maybe they are completely full of shit? There's always that chance. But, I personally know people in Houston who have known and worked with them for years. I'm told they are credible people. As they say in the interview, few people in elected office are interested in exposing flaws in a system that worked for them. I don't know, 100%, if the information is true. What I do know is: What they say is possible, and even plausible. It shouldn't be. There are easy methods to prevent that kind of fraud. No one seems interested in implementing them. Which, makes me conclude: They're just not that interesting in stopping it. |
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Aug 14, 2023 22:46:18 GMT
He said “fight like hell” and I’m supposed to interpret that as “peacefully”? And because I don’t, it’s Trump hatred? You make me laugh. Obama told his supporter's to "bring a gun" to political debates. Should he have been prosecuted for the guy that shot up Republican softball players? I don't recall ever seeing a politician prosecuted for rhetoric. ONLY, the orange man... who, we all know is... "bad" “Bring a gun.” Vs: 2 months of constant false rhetoric, with a final statement to fight like hell to stop the election confirmation, or we won’t have a country any more. Grasping at straws. |
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Aug 14, 2023 22:47:13 GMT
You imagined or misremembered something from the movie while stating “It couldn’t be any plainer.” You’re better than this. I didn't imagine or misremember. It was just from the actual source of the data, not the 2000 Mule movie. Frankly, I never watched the entire movie. Only a few clips. I'd already heard the underlying premise. rumble.com/v10ajh2-how-the-did-it-true-the-votes-catherine-engelbrecht-and-gregg-phillips-on-t.htmlDiscussion about this starts at the 45:00 mark. Watch the entire thing, if you can stomach it. IF what they say is true, to me, this is definitive proof of massive fraud. I don't see any other way to look at it. Of course, they announced their work a year ago, and no government agency seems interested in the slightest. So, maybe they are completely full of shit? There's always that chance. But, I personally know people in Houston who have known and worked with them for years. I'm told they are credible people. As they say in the interview, few people in elected office are interested in exposing flaws in a system that worked for them. I don't know, 100%, if the information is true. What I do know is: What they say is possible, and even plausible. It shouldn't be. There are easy methods to prevent that kind of fraud. No one seems interested in implementing them. Which, makes me conclude: They're just not that interesting in stopping it. They just contradicted what they said in the movie about data sets purchased and analyzed. |
|
|
|
Post by Bryant Hopwood on Aug 23, 2023 0:46:49 GMT
Hey,freeforums.net Admin As a small business owner, “be a graphic design expert” probably wasn’t what you signed up for. AdCreative.ai takes this process off your hands, giving you incredible wallet-opening ad creatives. Test, test, and test some more the easy way. You’ll also get a $500 Google Ad Credit for signing up! Start your 7-day trial today -> aismartad.comBest, James |
|
