|
Post by Bevo on May 8, 2024 19:49:30 GMT
Now Georgia, after investigation has no ballot images for over 380,000 ballots, in violation of federal and georgia election laws. In Wisconsin, a city manager (Vogg) has been fired for manually printing 64,000 ballots in a back room and having random employees sign them. About as safe and secure as the vaccine they peddled.
There is so much information that has been presented over the years that you would at least question the possibility of how election fraud could have change the election out come.
Watching 2000 mules should at least make you think. How about stopping the election count in several major cities then at 4 AM 2 of the states that were behind had a drop of votes that went 100% to Biden. How about the video of Fulton county that shows them stopping the count. Then only democrats return to continue the count.
Here is a quote from aufan "Wikipedia, CNN, others report Hilary having 1,877,963 votes in Georgia in 2016. This is the number you used. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Georgia_elections Other sources, such as Politico, or the county level data that I used says she got 1,837,300 votes in Georgia. www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/georgia/Which is correct? Honestly, I don’t know."
I went out a did a little research on this and of the 15+ sites I went to everyone with the exception of Politico had 1,877,963 for Hilary. The only source that I found that had 1,837,300 was Politico.
aufan Can you site the other sources that says Hilary got 1,837,300 votes? You accuse Bevo of lying but you used the knowingly false or inconclusive data from Politico to make your point.
Remember when you told me it was a waste of time conversing with that guy? You were right. It's a total waste of time. He's not honest. He is completely brainwashed. He's a lost soul, who seems to have no purpose in life other than dragging other people into his pit of anger and despair. Live is WAY too short for that.
|
|
aufan
Full Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 193
|
Post by aufan on May 8, 2024 20:25:36 GMT
There is so much information that has been presented over the years that you would at least question the possibility of how election fraud could have change the election out come.
Watching 2000 mules should at least make you think. How about stopping the election count in several major cities then at 4 AM 2 of the states that were behind had a drop of votes that went 100% to Biden. How about the video of Fulton county that shows them stopping the count. Then only democrats return to continue the count.
Here is a quote from aufan "Wikipedia, CNN, others report Hilary having 1,877,963 votes in Georgia in 2016. This is the number you used. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Georgia_elections Other sources, such as Politico, or the county level data that I used says she got 1,837,300 votes in Georgia. www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/georgia/Which is correct? Honestly, I don’t know."
I went out a did a little research on this and of the 15+ sites I went to everyone with the exception of Politico had 1,877,963 for Hilary. The only source that I found that had 1,837,300 was Politico.
aufan Can you site the other sources that says Hilary got 1,837,300 votes? You accuse Bevo of lying but you used the knowingly false or inconclusive data from Politico to make your point.
Remember when you told me it was a waste of time conversing with that guy? You were right. It's a total waste of time. He's not honest. He is completely brainwashed. He's a lost soul, who seems to have no purpose in life other than dragging other people into his pit of anger and despair. Live is WAY too short for that. Back to insults I see, rather than addressing your misinformation. Zuckerbucks counties in Georgia did see growth, over 30%, but you said they had no such growth. Where have I not been honest? I used the same data source that you posted, to show that you were posting misinformation.
|
|
aufan
Full Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 193
|
Post by aufan on May 11, 2024 7:34:36 GMT
This thread has brought so much entertainment that I want to summarize. Bevo admits there is no discernible evidence of elector fraud, and that the talking points he repeats are not evidence of fraud: Unfortunately for Trump (And our country), the way the fraud was most likely done left no easily discernable evidence. The "mountain of evidence" is different. That is the evidence of election "rigging", which may are may not be actual "fraud". Even conspiracy guy ajbuckeye has downgraded election fraud from definitely happened to now questioning the possibility: There is so much information that has been presented over the years that you would at least question the possibility of how election fraud could have change the election out come. Meanwhile indictments were handed out in Arizona for election fraud and not a single person here will even acknowledge it! Hypocritical to say the least. Speaking of hypocritical, Bevo and ajbuckeye post misinformation regarding Zuckerbucks. When I correct them, using the data they provided and used, I get called a liar, brainwashed, etc. because now that data they provided is wrong. As usual Bevo rage quits the discussion with insults, but with a moment of self reflection. I suppose when your worldview (and maybe even personality) is based upon a dying and hypocritical political party, anger and despair is what you feel when someone points it out.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on May 11, 2024 21:43:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on May 11, 2024 21:45:48 GMT
You have to stay away from "fraud". Much better, and more accurate to say unconstitutional ballots.
|
|
aufan
Full Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 193
|
Post by aufan on May 13, 2024 18:42:29 GMT
You have to stay away from "fraud". Much better, and more accurate to say unconstitutional ballots. I’m beginning to respect your style. You post bullshit, you know it’s bullshit, but don’t care and keep on posting it. You don’t stoop to insults or even try to defend the bullshit, you just move onto the next propaganda piece like a good solider. As a side note, has your Twitter feed given you the canned conservative response to the elector fraud indictments in Arizona that you can copy/paste here? Or is that news too liberal to have crossed your Twitter feed?
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on May 14, 2024 13:13:43 GMT
You have to stay away from "fraud". Much better, and more accurate to say unconstitutional ballots. I’m beginning to respect your style. You post bullshit, you know it’s bullshit, but don’t care and keep on posting it. You don’t stoop to insults or even try to defend the bullshit, you just move onto the next propaganda piece like a good solider. As a side note, has your Twitter feed given you the canned conservative response to the elector fraud indictments in Arizona that you can copy/paste here? Or is that news too liberal to have crossed your Twitter feed? Look at you go....and not even wearing a helmet!
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on May 14, 2024 13:19:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on May 15, 2024 14:42:29 GMT
Remember when you told me it was a waste of time conversing with that guy? You were right. It's a total waste of time. He's not honest. He is completely brainwashed. He's a lost soul, who seems to have no purpose in life other than dragging other people into his pit of anger and despair. Live is WAY too short for that. Back to insults I see, rather than addressing your misinformation. Zuckerbucks counties in Georgia did see growth, over 30%, but you said they had no such growth. Where have I not been honest? I used the same data source that you posted, to show that you were posting misinformation. Where have you not been honest?
You went ahead a did your research and found that every source other than Politico had 1,877,963 votes for Hilary. Politico was the only source that had 1,837,300 votes. You 100% knew that this data was either false or incomplete yet you continued to use it. Instead of acknowledging that the data source was false you continue to beat the dead horse over and over and over and over.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on May 15, 2024 16:54:23 GMT
CNN agrees to Biden campaign *DEMANDS* for Presidential Debate
• No Live Audience • No RFK Jr • Trump's mic muted (when Biden speaks) • No Fox News • CNN will announce moderators
|
|
aufan
Full Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 193
|
Post by aufan on May 15, 2024 16:56:21 GMT
Back to insults I see, rather than addressing your misinformation. Zuckerbucks counties in Georgia did see growth, over 30%, but you said they had no such growth. Where have I not been honest? I used the same data source that you posted, to show that you were posting misinformation. Where have you not been honest?
You went ahead a did your research and found that every source other than Politico had 1,877,963 votes for Hilary. Politico was the only source that had 1,837,300 votes. You 100% knew that this data was either false or incomplete yet you continued to use it. Instead of acknowledging that the data source was false you continue to beat the dead horse over and over and over and over.
Politico was not the only source that attributed 1,837,300 votes for Hilary. The website Bevo posted and you’ve been to say that Zuckerbucks influenced the election also attributed 1,837,300 votes to Hillary. capitalresearch.org/article/shining-a-light-on-zuck-bucks-in-key-states/I already explained this twice, maybe the third time is a charm. It is easy to see that the Zuckerbucks analysis matches Politico: Fulton County Hilary Votes: -Zuckerbucks analysis: 281,875 -County level data I linked: 281,875 -Politico: 281,875 -Wikipedia: 297,051 -CNN: 297,051 There are at least two other sources that match politico, including the one you used to complain about Zuckerbucks!. Will you acknowledge their data source was false? (By the way, I don’t know which was is real, but I confirmed the county level data I used and linked matched the Zuckerbucks analysis data).
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on May 18, 2024 14:17:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on May 20, 2024 17:55:14 GMT
Where have you not been honest?
You went ahead a did your research and found that every source other than Politico had 1,877,963 votes for Hilary. Politico was the only source that had 1,837,300 votes. You 100% knew that this data was either false or incomplete yet you continued to use it. Instead of acknowledging that the data source was false you continue to beat the dead horse over and over and over and over.
Politico was not the only source that attributed 1,837,300 votes for Hilary. The website Bevo posted and you’ve been to say that Zuckerbucks influenced the election also attributed 1,837,300 votes to Hillary. capitalresearch.org/article/shining-a-light-on-zuck-bucks-in-key-states/I already explained this twice, maybe the third time is a charm. It is easy to see that the Zuckerbucks analysis matches Politico: Fulton County Hilary Votes: -Zuckerbucks analysis: 281,875 -County level data I linked: 281,875 -Politico: 281,875 -Wikipedia: 297,051 -CNN: 297,051 There are at least two other sources that match politico, including the one you used to complain about Zuckerbucks!. Will you acknowledge their data source was false? (By the way, I don’t know which was is real, but I confirmed the county level data I used and linked matched the Zuckerbucks analysis data). Let me explain to you for the third maybe fourth time. You are basing your argument on data that you know is false and you continue to run with. Go ahead and explain your reasoning a fifth time if you want. Just keep in mind you are trying to justify your position on data you know is 100% false. Keep in mind that you are the one that pointed out Wiki CNN and others had 297,051 votes. You clearly looked this up so when I did the same search it way very clear that almost every source agreed with the Wiki and CNN including the National Archives. Yet you chose to pick one of the very few sources that you knew was false and you used to continue to beat the dead horse.
|
|
aufan
Full Member
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 193
|
Post by aufan on May 20, 2024 18:35:41 GMT
Politico was not the only source that attributed 1,837,300 votes for Hilary. The website Bevo posted and you’ve been to say that Zuckerbucks influenced the election also attributed 1,837,300 votes to Hillary. capitalresearch.org/article/shining-a-light-on-zuck-bucks-in-key-states/I already explained this twice, maybe the third time is a charm. It is easy to see that the Zuckerbucks analysis matches Politico: Fulton County Hilary Votes: -Zuckerbucks analysis: 281,875 -County level data I linked: 281,875 -Politico: 281,875 -Wikipedia: 297,051 -CNN: 297,051 There are at least two other sources that match politico, including the one you used to complain about Zuckerbucks!. Will you acknowledge their data source was false? (By the way, I don’t know which was is real, but I confirmed the county level data I used and linked matched the Zuckerbucks analysis data). Let me explain to you for the third maybe fourth time. You are basing your argument on data that you know is false and you continue to run with. Go ahead and explain your reasoning a fifth time if you want. Just keep in mind you are trying to justify your position on data you know is 100% false. Keep in mind that you are the one that pointed out Wiki CNN and others had 297,051 votes. You clearly looked this up so when I did the same search it way very clear that almost every source agreed with the Wiki and CNN including the National Archives. Yet you chose to pick one of the very few sources that you knew was false and you used to continue to beat the dead horse. So you are saying the Zuckerbucks analysis Bevo posted was using false data? Fine with me. So I assume you’ll stop claiming Zuckerbucks impacted the election?
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on May 20, 2024 19:51:44 GMT
Let me explain to you for the third maybe fourth time. You are basing your argument on data that you know is false and you continue to run with. Go ahead and explain your reasoning a fifth time if you want. Just keep in mind you are trying to justify your position on data you know is 100% false. Keep in mind that you are the one that pointed out Wiki CNN and others had 297,051 votes. You clearly looked this up so when I did the same search it way very clear that almost every source agreed with the Wiki and CNN including the National Archives. Yet you chose to pick one of the very few sources that you knew was false and you used to continue to beat the dead horse. So you are saying the Zuckerbucks analysis Bevo posted was using false data? Fine with me. So I assume you’ll stop claiming Zuckerbucks impacted the election? Quite honestly the way you were utilizing the data did very little to prove the effect Zuckerburg had on the election in UGA. For this data to be relevant you would really need to know the vote counts from the votes that were casted through the Zuckerburg drop boxes and the ones that didn't. This data was not provided. Therefore the entire discussion was irrelevant from that point of view. Considering the data source used was false makes it even more irrelevant. To answer your questions the Zuckerbucks analysis did use false data. No I will not stop to claim Zuckerbucks impacted the election? We do know that the Zuckerbucks boxes were placed in place that were more heavily leaning democrats. Election outcomes in previous years comparing Georgia Elections vs US General Election Votes 2008 to 2012 Change in voter tournout GA:Dem -3.2% US:Dem -5.1% GA:Rep +1.2% US:Rep +1.6 % GA:Gen -1.1% US: Gen -2.0 2012 to 2016 Change in voter tournout GA:Dem +5.9% US:Dem 0% GA:Rep +0.5% US:Rep +3.3% GA:Gen -3.0% US:Gen +1.6% 2016 to 2020 Change in voter tournout GA:Dem +31.2% US:Dem +23.4% GA:Rep +17.8% US:Rep +17.8% GA:Gen +24.4% US:Gen +20.6% The amount of votes that Georgia cast for Joe Biden clearly out performed the General Election by a signficant margin and I do believe that Zuckerbucks had a lot to do with that.
|
|