|
Post by tigercpa on Jul 25, 2024 16:16:11 GMT
🇺🇲 2024 GE: @rasmussen_Poll
🟥 Trump: 50% (+7) 🟦 Harris: 43% 🟪 Other: 4% — 🟥 Trump: 49% (+7) 🟦 Harris: 42% 🟨 RFK Jr: 4% 🟩 Stein: 1%
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Jul 25, 2024 16:31:31 GMT
The party that doesn’t know what a woman is wants you to vote for a woman as your president because she’s a woman. Do you have any original thoughts or do you just copy and paste everything from twitter?
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Jul 26, 2024 13:11:42 GMT
The party that doesn’t know what a woman is wants you to vote for a woman as your president because she’s a woman. Do you have any original thoughts or do you just copy and paste everything from twitter? Thanks for playing.
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Jul 26, 2024 14:56:33 GMT
Do you have any original thoughts or do you just copy and paste everything from twitter? Thanks for playing. Meanwhile Trump says “We're not going to have a socialist president, especially a female socialist president”. While you copy/paste false criticism that democrats are only voting for Kamala because she is a woman, Trump is saying we especially don’t want a female president.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Jul 26, 2024 15:25:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Jul 27, 2024 15:41:23 GMT
Trump says this is the last time we need to vote, in four years it will all be fixed.
Is this just the ramblings of a sick old man? Or is project 2025 planning to eliminate elections? Any insight from MAGA on this one?
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Jul 29, 2024 16:56:52 GMT
I see ActBlue up to its usual tricks.
Missouri AG is investigvating potential fraudulent donations to Harris via ActBlue.
One example - where a 79-year-old woman had allegedly made 22,619 donations to Democrats for $839,466.
James O'Keefe is also investigating similar claims. He found one woman who allegedly made 3 donations a day for one year. She knew nothing about it.
I mean, who really believe that a candidate that got zero votes last time, now overnight gets $80 million dollars from 1st time donors?
The probability of that approaches zero quickly.
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Jul 29, 2024 22:17:49 GMT
CPA, I'd be very interested if you'd kindly answer Aufan's question about trump's claim of 'The last election' and "no more voting necessary" ( when he takes office ) Thank you. And your opinion only...not some extreme right wing propaganda site. You're intelligent...don't need that crap for thinking instructions.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Jul 30, 2024 14:05:17 GMT
CPA, I'd be very interested if you'd kindly answer Aufan's question about trump's claim of 'The last election' and "no more voting necessary" ( when he takes office ) Thank you. And your opinion only...not some extreme right wing propaganda site. You're intelligent...don't need that crap for thinking instructions. This one is easy and straight-forward, like most, if you listen. So, Trump was speaking to Christians, whom he said many never vote. "Many Christians aren't big voters". He was soliciting support from this group that never votes, urging them to vote for him this time, and he will fix it. "...I'll fix it so good you won't need to vote again..." From the NYT: Nothing about being a dictator, or staying in office beyond the end of his second term. Vote this time, give him a chance to fix it. Naturally, the media ran with "Trump says he will end all elections. You will never get to vote again" bullshit. He was speaking to a narrow group of people who don't vote, and urging them to vote. That's it. Nothing more. Pattern recognition is one of the best ways we learn. And, over the years, the media miquoting and mischaracterizing Trump has provided a masterclass. You can literally watch him live during the day, and easily know how the media will spin it on the 6pm news. This example was no different.
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Jul 30, 2024 17:43:19 GMT
CPA, I'd be very interested if you'd kindly answer Aufan's question about trump's claim of 'The last election' and "no more voting necessary" ( when he takes office ) Thank you. And your opinion only...not some extreme right wing propaganda site. You're intelligent...don't need that crap for thinking instructions. This one is easy and straight-forward, like most, if you listen. So, Trump was speaking to Christians, whom he said many never vote. "Many Christians aren't big voters". He was soliciting support from this group that never votes, urging them to vote for him this time, and he will fix it. "...I'll fix it so good you won't need to vote again..." From the NYT: Nothing about being a dictator, or staying in office beyond the end of his second term. Vote this time, give him a chance to fix it. Naturally, the media ran with "Trump says he will end all elections. You will never get to vote again" bullshit. He was speaking to a narrow group of people who don't vote, and urging them to vote. That's it. Nothing more. Pattern recognition is one of the best ways we learn. And, over the years, the media miquoting and mischaracterizing Trump has provided a masterclass. You can literally watch him live during the day, and easily know how the media will spin it on the 6pm news. This example was no different. I am concerned on how he will fix it so good that you won’t need to vote again. Remember, what was broken last time is that he lost the presidency when he lost the election. I would not want him to fix this, for example. Something you can’t argue against is that his policy of “fix it” is project 2025. I don’t want him to “fix” things with Project 2025.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Jul 30, 2024 18:08:54 GMT
This one is easy and straight-forward, like most, if you listen. So, Trump was speaking to Christians, whom he said many never vote. "Many Christians aren't big voters". He was soliciting support from this group that never votes, urging them to vote for him this time, and he will fix it. "...I'll fix it so good you won't need to vote again..." From the NYT: Nothing about being a dictator, or staying in office beyond the end of his second term. Vote this time, give him a chance to fix it. Naturally, the media ran with "Trump says he will end all elections. You will never get to vote again" bullshit. He was speaking to a narrow group of people who don't vote, and urging them to vote. That's it. Nothing more. Pattern recognition is one of the best ways we learn. And, over the years, the media miquoting and mischaracterizing Trump has provided a masterclass. You can literally watch him live during the day, and easily know how the media will spin it on the 6pm news. This example was no different. I am concerned on how he will fix it so good that you won’t need to vote again. Remember, what was broken last time is that he lost the presidency when he lost the election. I would not want him to fix this, for example. Something you can’t argue against is that his policy of “fix it” is project 2025. I don’t want him to “fix” things with Project 2025. Some of those I don't align with either.
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Jul 31, 2024 18:52:17 GMT
I am concerned on how he will fix it so good that you won’t need to vote again. Remember, what was broken last time is that he lost the presidency when he lost the election. I would not want him to fix this, for example. Something you can’t argue against is that his policy of “fix it” is project 2025. I don’t want him to “fix” things with Project 2025. Some of those I don't align with either. A moment of humanity from the Twitter copy/paste guy. I’m impressed. Care to be specific? I’ve seen a lot of awful things in project 2025. Considering that it is the Trump policy, it makes it an easy vote against him purely on policy, never mind all the other awful character flaws.
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Jul 31, 2024 19:12:17 GMT
Some of those I don't align with either. A moment of humanity from the Twitter copy/paste guy. I’m impressed. Care to be specific? I’ve seen a lot of awful things in project 2025. Considering that it is the Trump policy, it makes it an easy vote against him purely on policy, never mind all the other awful character flaws. But it's NOT "Trump Policy"... he has publicly disavowed it. His policies are specified in 'Agenda 47'. If you can't find something you dislike in a 1000-page policy brief, there's something wrong with you. I never even HEARD of "Project 2025" until about 6 weeks ago.
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Jul 31, 2024 22:33:13 GMT
A moment of humanity from the Twitter copy/paste guy. I’m impressed. Care to be specific? I’ve seen a lot of awful things in project 2025. Considering that it is the Trump policy, it makes it an easy vote against him purely on policy, never mind all the other awful character flaws. But it's NOT "Trump Policy"... he has publicly disavowed it. His policies are specified in 'Agenda 47'. If you can't find something you dislike in a 1000-page policy brief, there's something wrong with you. I never even HEARD of "Project 2025" until about 6 weeks ago. You are unfamiliar with the conservative bible? Well let me give you a brief history. Project 2025, is the newest revision of the Heritage Foundation’s “A Mandate for Leadership”. It is what they call the “policy bible”, their words, not mine.. The first copy was published in 1981 and a cornerstone of the Reagan administration, who distributed it to his cabinet. It has been updated many times, and the latest version of “A Mandate for Leadership” is also known as Project 2025. There are many connections between Trump and Project 2025, including his campaign saying there is much overlap between Plan 47 and Project 2025. The most relevant overlap is his executive order late in his presidency to create schedule F class of federal employees. This is a central point of project 2025 and one Trump promises to reenact. Conservatism is synonymous with the Heritage Foundation and Project 2025. Trump is smart to try to distance himself from conservatism, as it is unpopular. Conservatism has lost 7 of the last 8 popular elections, and is only relevant due to overrepresentation in the house and senate. We don’t need a republican candidate that distances themselves from conservatism because it is unpopular, just to govern as conservative when elected. We need a republican candidate, and Republican Party, that distances itself from conservatism and then governs that way. Until a republican rebukes the conservative bible AND governs that way, democrat is the only logical choice, unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Aug 1, 2024 2:01:40 GMT
Trump is smart to try to distance himself from conservatism, as it is unpopular. Conservatism has lost 7 of the last 8 popular elections, Liberalism has had a good run. It's pervasive at all the levers of power in the media, academia, and popular culture. They had a great spokesperson for the past 16 years with Obama. But the pendulum has a way of swinging back to the norm. Conservative ideas are still the best in the long run. The tide is turning on many of the looniest ideas of the modern-day liberal, like it's perfectly OK for biological males to compete in sports against women. The new Gen Z voters are showing a tendency toward more conservatism, especially fiscally. As the country edges closer and closer to financial ruin brought on by extreme excess debt, I think conservatism will make a big comeback. Reigning in the out-of-control monster that our federal government has become is Step 1. And Trump is the guy to start the process.
|
|