|
|
Post by bluehen on Dec 21, 2020 14:29:30 GMT
Here's the NFL's eye test of CF talent as of 12/18/20.
NFL active roster players per conference member """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
SEC - 22.9 B10 - 18.9 P12 - 16.4 ACC - 16.0
B12 - 13.3 AAC - 7.6 CUSA- 5.6 MWC - 5.5 MAC - 3.7 SBC - 3.1
|
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Dec 21, 2020 20:25:56 GMT
.....and the top 5 G5 producers
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Temple -16
Boise State - 14
Houston - 12
So Miss - 12
Cincinnati - 11
Wyoming - 11
And the top 5 small college ball producers
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Harvard - 7 (14 Ivy leaguers on NFL active rosters)
James Madison - 7
N Dakota St.- 7
Chattanooga -5
Idaho - 5
E. Washington -5
201 lower division players on NFL active rosters
|
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Dec 22, 2020 2:16:16 GMT
Here's the NFL's eye test of CF talent as of 12/18/20.
NFL active roster players per conference member """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
SEC - 22.9 B10 - 18.9 P12 - 16.4 ACC - 16.0
B12 - 13.3 AAC - 7.6 CUSA- 5.6 MWC - 5.5 MAC - 3.7 SBC - 3.1
What a coincidence. The list is split, right on that “arbitrary” line of distinction: P5 vs G5. Maybe the press (who invented the names) got it right ? |
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 22, 2020 13:54:44 GMT
 Here's an eye test. |
|
|
|
Post by doc on Dec 22, 2020 14:02:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Dec 22, 2020 15:09:44 GMT
Here's the NFL's eye test of CF talent as of 12/18/20.
NFL active roster players per conference member """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
SEC - 22.9 B10 - 18.9 P12 - 16.4 ACC - 16.0
B12 - 13.3 AAC - 7.6 CUSA- 5.6 MWC - 5.5 MAC - 3.7 SBC - 3.1
What a coincidence. The list is split, right on that “arbitrary” line of distinction: P5 vs G5. Maybe the press (who invented the names) got it right ?Well sure Bevo, but this political, greed driven , non NCAA two class system pretty well assures that the top talent generally gets hoarded to the top brand name programs just as with post season opportunities. However how about these factoids :Temple and Boise State , each, have more current NFL players than 1/2 of the , so called, P5 teams. Heck, FCS Harvard has more current NFL players than 4 , so called, P5 teams...6% of P5.....Harvard ! I say. The same Harvard than mandates its players to be able to read and write on the college level and speak in complete and coherent sentences. |
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Dec 22, 2020 15:10:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Dec 23, 2020 3:02:05 GMT
Here's an eye test. FINALLY! Something we can ALL agree on! :-) |
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Dec 23, 2020 3:04:03 GMT
What a coincidence. The list is split, right on that “arbitrary” line of distinction: P5 vs G5. Maybe the press (who invented the names) got it right ?Well sure Bevo, but this political, greed driven , non NCAA two class system pretty well assures that the top talent generally gets hoarded to the top brand name programs just as with post season opportunities. However how about these factoids :Temple and Boise State , each, have more current NFL players than 1/2 of the , so called, P5 teams. Heck, FCS Harvard has more current NFL players than 4 , so called, P5 teams...6% of P5.....Harvard ! I say. The same Harvard than mandates its players to be able to read and write on the college level and speak in complete and coherent sentences. There is some overlap between teams, but NONE between conferences. And, really.. very little even between teams. It's largely a matter of money. But, I think we can both agree: Money doesn't guarantee success. |
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Dec 23, 2020 17:29:44 GMT
Agree . Maybe money can buy success 85% of the time in sports. I don't know where that # came from...just made it up I guess.
In my count I actually found that the very top of the 63 scholarship FCS is just as talented as the very bottom of the , so called, 85 scholly P5.(by NFL standards)
Here it is mixed together :
James Madison - 7
Wake Forest - 7
N Dakota St - 7
Harvard - 7
Arizona - 6
Syracuse - 6
Chattanooga - 5
E. Washington -5
Idaho -5
N. Iowa - 4
Illinois St. - 4
Ferris St. - 4
Delaware - 4
Kansas - 4
S.Carolina St . 4
Iowa State - 3
|
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 23, 2020 17:31:54 GMT
The Big Ten’s combined win percentage is only .500 this year. a bad year! In the SEC, this would be called "having great depth in the conference" by the analysts.  |
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Dec 23, 2020 18:25:25 GMT
The Strength Everywhere Conference is one of CF's ongoing myths
|
|
|
|
Post by doc on Dec 23, 2020 18:46:08 GMT
The Big Ten’s combined win percentage is only .500 this year. a bad year! In the SEC, this would be called "having great depth in the conference" by the analysts. The Big Ten only played in conference games - they can only be .500. I’d think a CPA could figure that out😉. If the SEC Figured a way to have a higher than .500 record playing only conference games I’d be interested in how they did it. I know the ACC played some OOC games. |
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 23, 2020 19:09:23 GMT
The Strength Everywhere Conference is one of CF's ongoing myths I knew you would like that one, Hen. They were ragging on Danielson for his usual CBS propaganda. The SEC going .500 in conference is a display of power, parity and depth. |
|
|
|
Post by doc on Dec 23, 2020 20:03:55 GMT
The Strength Everywhere Conference is one of CF's ongoing myths I knew you would like that one, Hen. They were ragging on Danielson for his usual CBS propaganda. The SEC going .500 in conference is a display of power, parity and depth. Did he really say that? |
|
