|
Hey CJ
Dec 22, 2015 2:34:15 GMT
Post by Bevo on Dec 22, 2015 2:34:15 GMT
I know you said you're system is not meant to be predictive, but..... I used it as a guide, and it's doing pretty well so far. I've correctly picked 6 of 7 vs the spread so far.... hope it continues.
|
|
|
Hey CJ
Dec 27, 2015 15:15:01 GMT
via mobile
Post by cjhawkeyes on Dec 27, 2015 15:15:01 GMT
I'm curious how that worked. As of now the higher ranked team going in is only 8-10. However, the winner is the higher ranked team following 16 of 18 bowls.
|
|
|
Hey CJ
Dec 27, 2015 17:54:51 GMT
Post by Bevo on Dec 27, 2015 17:54:51 GMT
I'm curious how that worked. As of now the higher ranked team going in is only 8-10. However, the winner is the higher ranked team following 16 of 18 bowls.
So far, I'm still winning... I'm 15 wins, 6 losses so far (They have a couple of over-unders thrown in).
It was tough, trying to evaluate how many points might be justified by the difference in your rankings. But, several of the under dogs were ranked higher by you system. I think, all of them have covered.
|
|
|
Hey CJ
Dec 27, 2015 22:45:16 GMT
Post by bluehen on Dec 27, 2015 22:45:16 GMT
In the first 18 PSEGs, Dogs and Favorites have each covered 9 games.
|
|