|
|
Post by GatorGrad on Sept 20, 2016 19:31:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Sept 20, 2016 19:58:43 GMT
I guess it's better than Rock, Paper, Scissors??
|
|
|
|
Post by FLORIDA HERD FAN on Sept 20, 2016 20:03:34 GMT
What is wrong with having co-champions?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Sept 20, 2016 23:07:26 GMT
What is wrong with having co-champions? Only ONE gets the bonus for admission to the CFP. |
|
|
|
Post by Hero on Sept 21, 2016 0:05:15 GMT
What is wrong with having co-champions? That is punting to the committee. The Big12 proved that won't work. |
|
|
|
Post by FLORIDA HERD FAN on Sept 21, 2016 2:18:59 GMT
What is wrong with having co-champions? Only ONE gets the bonus for admission to the CFP. The ACC and the CFP are different animals. There is no reason why the conference can't have co-champions. It is certainly better than hiring a consultant to decide. The CFP could select one or two of the co-champions, or none. |
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Sept 21, 2016 3:50:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Sept 21, 2016 13:54:22 GMT
Only ONE gets the bonus for admission to the CFP. The ACC and the CFP are different animals. There is no reason why the conference can't have co-champions. It is certainly better than hiring a consultant to decide. The CFP could select one or two of the co-champions, or none.
The ACC Champion will be the winner of the CCG.
This tie-breaker is to determine WHO plays in the CCG is three teams in the same division all have the same record.
|
|
|
|
Post by GatorGrad on Sept 21, 2016 14:02:56 GMT
What is wrong with having co-champions? Nothing but they still would need to determine who represents the division in the ACC Championship Game... |
|
|
|
Post by FLORIDA HERD FAN on Sept 21, 2016 16:25:06 GMT
What is wrong with having co-champions? Nothing but they still would need to determine who represents the division in the ACC Championship Game... That makes sense, but it seems that there should be a better way than using an outside consultant to make the decision. I suppose the odds are very low of it coming to that. |
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Sept 21, 2016 17:13:33 GMT
Nothing but they still would need to determine who represents the division in the ACC Championship Game... I suppose the odds are very low of it coming to that. I don't know about that. It's pretty easy to have a three way, 1-loss tie. If it CAN happen, it will... eventually. |
|
|
|
Post by GatorGrad on Sept 22, 2016 14:14:40 GMT
Nothing but they still would need to determine who represents the division in the ACC Championship Game... That makes sense, but it seems that there should be a better way than using an outside consultant to make the decision. I suppose the odds are very low of it coming to that. If three teams tie for 1st place at 7-1 in the division (with team A beating team B who beat team C who beat team A) I don't know why they can't use total Points For / Points Against in games against each other. For example Lville should get more credit for their blowout over FSU in this case vs had they just won by a point. |
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Sept 22, 2016 15:11:13 GMT
Nothing but they still would need to determine who represents the division in the ACC Championship Game... That makes sense, but it seems that there should be a better way than using an outside consultant to make the decision. I suppose the odds are very low of it coming to that. Agree, sounds like Swofford is passing the buck on this one |
|
|
|
Post by cjhawkeyes on Sept 25, 2016 16:19:59 GMT
At least its objective even if a convoluted choice without transparency. Progress?
|
|
