|
Post by FLORIDA HERD FAN on Dec 9, 2017 9:31:03 GMT
Fake news! lol
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 9, 2017 11:37:48 GMT
The leaks are real, the news is fake. 2 great examples this week of Flynn's team of leak busters doing their jobs very well: 1. The Donald Jr. / Wikileaks email which CNN bit on 2. The Deutsche Bank subpeona which Bloomberg bit on Trump and Sessions are flushing out all the IC leakers. The flushing has been increasing in frequency simultaneous to the reports that the Inspector General was close to wrapping up their years-long investigation.
|
|
|
Post by FLORIDA HERD FAN on Dec 9, 2017 14:54:05 GMT
It looks like CNN had made an honest mistake.
However, whether it was the day before or the day after the public release shouldn’t make any difference, assuming that the email and encryption key were not solicited by Trump, Jr. I haven’t seen any indication that either were solicited.
Even if they were solicited, and the Trump campaign had coordinated with Assange, I don’t see anything improper.
A big fat irrelevant non-story.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 9, 2017 15:10:49 GMT
It looks like CNN had made an honest mistake. However, whether it was the day before or the day after the public release shouldn’t make any difference, assuming that the email and encryption key were not solicited by Trump, Jr. I haven’t seen any indication that either were solicited. Even if they were solicited, and the Trump campaign had coordinated with Assange, I don’t see anything improper. A big fat irrelevant non-story. I agree, the story itself is a nothingburger.
But, it wasn't a mistake.
CNN was purposefully fed wrong (via someone on the House Intel Cte. most likely) info so that Trump and Sessions would identify the source of the leaks. You smoke out the leak by feeding a closed-end group the false info and see who spreads it.
The question is who fed CNN - my money would be on Adam Schiff (D-CA).
|
|
|
Post by Hero on Dec 9, 2017 15:36:41 GMT
It looks like CNN had made an honest mistake. However, whether it was the day before or the day after the public release shouldn’t make any difference, assuming that the email and encryption key were not solicited by Trump, Jr. I haven’t seen any indication that either were solicited. Even if they were solicited, and the Trump campaign had coordinated with Assange, I don’t see anything improper. A big fat irrelevant non-story. CNN has never made an honest mistake.
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Dec 9, 2017 16:29:33 GMT
It looks like CNN had made an honest mistake. However, whether it was the day before or the day after the public release shouldn’t make any difference, assuming that the email and encryption key were not solicited by Trump, Jr. I haven’t seen any indication that either were solicited. Even if they were solicited, and the Trump campaign had coordinated with Assange, I don’t see anything improper. A big fat irrelevant non-story. CNN was just sloppy. They rush everything in the hopes that THIS will be the thing that brings Trump down. To me, the bigger news is: why would wiki be sending unsolicited emails offering dirt to a campaign that was supposedly deep in cahoots with the Russians? I think it’s further evidence that no real contacts existed between them and the Trump campaign
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 9, 2017 17:47:46 GMT
All of this prompts the glaring, obvious, and critical question – one which CNN refuses to address: how did 'multiple sources' all misread the date on this document, in exactly the same way, and toward the same end, and then feed this false information to CNN?
Like Bevo said...anything to get at Trump.
|
|
|
Post by Hero on Dec 9, 2017 17:51:26 GMT
All of this prompts the glaring, obvious, and critical question – one which CNN refuses to address: how did 'multiple sources' all misread the date on this document, in exactly the same way, and toward the same end, and then feed this false information to CNN? Like I said...CNN has NEVER made an honest mistake.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 9, 2017 20:23:52 GMT
All of this prompts the glaring, obvious, and critical question – one which CNN refuses to address: how did 'multiple sources' all misread the date on this document, in exactly the same way, and toward the same end, and then feed this false information to CNN? Like I said...CNN has NEVER made an honest mistake. They are being fed barium meals.
|
|
|
Post by FLORIDA HERD FAN on Dec 10, 2017 0:25:11 GMT
All of this prompts the glaring, obvious, and critical question – one which CNN refuses to address: how did 'multiple sources' all misread the date on this document, in exactly the same way, and toward the same end, and then feed this false information to CNN? Like I said...CNN has NEVER made an honest mistake. So, you really, really do watch CNN?
|
|
|
Post by Hero on Dec 10, 2017 13:02:16 GMT
Like I said...CNN has NEVER made an honest mistake. So, you really, really do watch CNN? I don't have to see a skunk to know when one is around.
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Dec 10, 2017 15:18:39 GMT
Is there anyone remaining who, HONESTLY, doesn't understand what went on?
Hillary's campaign PAID for a "dossier of dirt" on Trump. A bunch of CRAP (much of it provided by Russians) was delivered. Officials in Obama's DOJ used this fake crap to get authorization from a FISA court to open surveillance of several key Trump campaign officials. Other officials in the Obama Admin (Susan Rice, mainly) unmasked names in the obtained information, and SPREAD the information back to the Hillary campaign. The Hillary campaign TRIED LIKE HELL to peddle all this false crap to the media. To their credit, during the campaign, the media largely ignored it... at least, until AFTER the election. I think, they never thought it would be needed.
THE DEGREE OF RECKLESSNESS by the Obama Admin was unprecedented because; They never conceived that Trump would win. They were pulling out ALL STOPS to make SURE of it.
As soon as it was apparent that Hillary was going to lose, they panicked... and, immediately concocted this entire "Russian Collusion" BS story and started planning for a Special Prosecutor... mostly, to make SURE they could control the information flow... Find it, bury it.... somehow, turn it against Trump.
It's the biggest scandal in a nation's history. The guilty will fight to the death to keep it from being fully uncovered. They HAVE to... The truth destroys them.
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 10, 2017 21:51:02 GMT
Yep.
THEN the guy who had drawn their attention (Flynn), purposefully LIED to them so that he would be charged, and thus provide evidence OF THE CORRUPTION.
He had to sacrifice himself, or else the corrupt people could deny everything. NOW, they can't deny it.
Further, the judge who presided over Flynn's guilty plea is also a FISA judge, and he suddenly recused himself from the the case.
Nobody's saying why. Maybe becuase he was the one who approved the FISA warrant?
|
|
|
Post by tigercpa on Dec 11, 2017 21:48:37 GMT
Megyn Kelly re-interiewed a few the Trump accusers this morning.
They are SO MUCH MORE believable the second time.
Who thought this would go well, I mean Megyn's psycho-obsessing over Trump went so well the first time....
|
|
|
Post by FLORIDA HERD FAN on Dec 11, 2017 23:33:46 GMT
So, you really, really do watch CNN? I don't have to see a skunk to know when one is around. You either watch CNN and know what you are talking about, or you don’t watch CNN and have no idea what you are talking about. Which is it?
|
|