|
Post by Bevo on Nov 16, 2018 1:01:07 GMT
So... you think the Big East was a better conference ? Got it.
Yes, Bevo, in the 47 games played between BE teams and SEC teams in the BCS era the BE was CLEARLY better. The BE won 60% of the time, the SEC won 40% of the time. First graders know that 60% is greater than 40%
Yea... I also know that, ALL-TIME, the SEC has won 60% of the games it played against other P5 conferences. The Big East, during it's short, pitiful existence, won only 43% of the games it played against P5 conferences. 60 is FAR BETTER than 43.
|
|
|
Post by bluehen on Nov 16, 2018 12:46:38 GMT
Common Knowledge, Bevo, common knowledge
You somehow cannot get the concept of 'head to head' and 'BCS era'...that's all the factoid is about...not about historical strength of any conferences. Therefore for the final time :
When BE teams and SEC teams have lined up to play college football vs each other in real football games the Big East teams have proven to be better....much much better in the BCS era (1998-2013) The record is 28-19. 10000% true fact. No way around it.
|
|
|
Post by Bevo on Nov 16, 2018 14:16:06 GMT
Common Knowledge, Bevo, common knowledge You somehow cannot get the concept of 'head to head' and 'BCS era'...that's all the factoid is about...not about historical strength of any conferences. Therefore for the final time : When BE teams and SEC teams have lined up to play college football vs each other in real football games the Big East teams have proven to be better....much much better in the BCS era (1998-2013) The record is 28-19. 10000% true fact. No way around it. I can't get past the fact that "BCS Era" is a useless and arbitrary time period. So, your 'fact' signifies NOTHING of any value.
In the 90's, the SEC was 8-4 against the Big East. THAT, is also 10000% true.... and, just as meaningless.
You're 'anti-SEC' paranoia gets old, Hen. Sometimes, you're 'facts' on that topic are interesting. This is NOT one of those.
|
|