Post by tigercpa on Mar 15, 2016 21:53:28 GMT
1. Trump may give her $100, which is probably closer to her usual nightly fee, given that she is an attention whore.
Gotcha -- smear the victim. How pathetic.
2. This will not go anywhere.
You don't know that.
3. I have yet to see a video that erases all doubt as to exactly what happened, and exactly who (Lewandowski? or maybe a security employee?) was involved.
So what? There doesn't have to be such a video. All that is required is that there not exist a video that is inconsistent with Fields' allegation. However, every video thus far is fully consistent with Fields' criminal complaint.
4. I do wonder why this same reporter always seems to be the victim of such alleged treatment.
Keep wondering. Be my guest. It means nothing.
5. 1) No one else, among the hundreds of people gathered around (almost all with phone camera or video) noticed this deadly assault.
That makes zero difference.
6. 2) The latest video to surface is the clearest yet. In the worst case, someone brushed the “reporter” with his hand as he moved past her. In a crowd of people I’m guessing he had no idea he had just committed a deadly assault.
All videos are consistent with Fields' criminal complaint and with Terris' account. There was no assault, much less a deadly assault. But, there was simple battery.
7. 3) As I said, this kind of stuff is a staple of the left.
So what? If Lewandowski committed battery upon the person of Fields', which is quite evident, justice has to be blind as to the political leanings of the parties.
8. This incident is not about Trump, it's about a lying media.
This incident is not about Trump, other than his judgment in hiring a thug like Lewandowski. Whether the media lies or tells the truth is immaterial.
9. While I think “someone” had contact with Ms. Fields, it is less than clear that the “someone” is Corey Lewandowski. That certainly has not been shown to be likely to have happened, much less proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the standard relevant to Ms. Field’s criminal complaint. It almost certainly never will be proven to either of these standards.
The video does not indicate that it could have been anyone other than Lewandowski. The audio recording and the eyewitness account point directly to Lewandowski.
10. The fact that a roomful of reporters, who are already atuned to watch for this kind of stuff, saw nothing tells you that this is an attempt to turn a fart into a hurricane. There is still absolutely no objective evidence substantiating it.
What other reporters didn't see is immaterial. However, there is a compelling body of evidence that the incident did occur exactly as Fields has alleged: audio recording, bruises, eyewitness account.
Gotcha -- smear the victim. How pathetic.
2. This will not go anywhere.
You don't know that.
3. I have yet to see a video that erases all doubt as to exactly what happened, and exactly who (Lewandowski? or maybe a security employee?) was involved.
So what? There doesn't have to be such a video. All that is required is that there not exist a video that is inconsistent with Fields' allegation. However, every video thus far is fully consistent with Fields' criminal complaint.
4. I do wonder why this same reporter always seems to be the victim of such alleged treatment.
Keep wondering. Be my guest. It means nothing.
5. 1) No one else, among the hundreds of people gathered around (almost all with phone camera or video) noticed this deadly assault.
That makes zero difference.
6. 2) The latest video to surface is the clearest yet. In the worst case, someone brushed the “reporter” with his hand as he moved past her. In a crowd of people I’m guessing he had no idea he had just committed a deadly assault.
All videos are consistent with Fields' criminal complaint and with Terris' account. There was no assault, much less a deadly assault. But, there was simple battery.
7. 3) As I said, this kind of stuff is a staple of the left.
So what? If Lewandowski committed battery upon the person of Fields', which is quite evident, justice has to be blind as to the political leanings of the parties.
8. This incident is not about Trump, it's about a lying media.
This incident is not about Trump, other than his judgment in hiring a thug like Lewandowski. Whether the media lies or tells the truth is immaterial.
9. While I think “someone” had contact with Ms. Fields, it is less than clear that the “someone” is Corey Lewandowski. That certainly has not been shown to be likely to have happened, much less proven beyond a reasonable doubt, the standard relevant to Ms. Field’s criminal complaint. It almost certainly never will be proven to either of these standards.
The video does not indicate that it could have been anyone other than Lewandowski. The audio recording and the eyewitness account point directly to Lewandowski.
10. The fact that a roomful of reporters, who are already atuned to watch for this kind of stuff, saw nothing tells you that this is an attempt to turn a fart into a hurricane. There is still absolutely no objective evidence substantiating it.
What other reporters didn't see is immaterial. However, there is a compelling body of evidence that the incident did occur exactly as Fields has alleged: audio recording, bruises, eyewitness account.
The latest video unambiguously shows she lied. Even listening to the audio, you don’t hear a scuffle of any sort. Just dead silence and then the 2 talking / exaggerating about what happened.
She’s a scammer. A gloryhound. That's her MO.
My opinion is Fields is looking for free publicity for her upcoming book. When you throw in a sketchy Washington Post reporter, the stench elevates to a three-day-old mackerel left in the August sun.