|
Post by ajbuckeye on May 1, 2024 18:10:22 GMT
Jimmy used to get beat up in almost every episode. I remember when he was older he would be chasing the young kids and he could barely run. You would see him about 20 yards behind and then all of the sudden he jumps on top of them and take them down.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on May 1, 2024 14:12:27 GMT
I like how he laughed at himself for the mistake. Wow you seem to be really in tune with what Biden is thinking.
Can you tell me what he was thinking on this one.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 18, 2024 14:33:59 GMT
You did it again. The study you referred to was between 2016 and 2020. There was nothing within that chart that showed 2012 Numbers yet you inject those numbers to justify your narrative??? Keep in mind that Trump was not even running in 2012.
Well yes, you have to have some sort of baseline or control group to reference when trying to determine the effect of a variable. You’ve rejected using non-Zuckerbucks counties, and now you’ve rejected using the same counties but in a different year. What would you suggest the baseline or control group to be for comparison? This was strictly about how Zuckerbucks had an effect on the election. Then you tie in the 2012 election as some sort of baseline that is completely irrelevant to the discussion. It simply was a data point that you tried to tie in simply to meet your narrative.
Then you call out Bevo for making very false claims regarding the effects of Zuckerbucks by presenting very false data.
-counties that did not receive grants had 31% more democrat votes in 2020 compared to 2016
-counties that did receive grants had 36% more democrat votes in 2020 compared to 2016
Let's keep it simple and just look at the data from 2016 and 2020 that you supposedly pulled your data from:
2016 2020 %change TrumpVotes 2,089,104(2016) 2,461,837(2020) ZuckerBuckCounties 1,155,840(2016) 1,358,867(2020) 18% increase NoZuckBuckConties 933,264(2016) 1,102,970(2020) 18% increase
Biden/ClintonVotes 1,877,963(2016) 2,474,507(2020) ZuckerBuckCounties 1,452,867(2016) 1,963,001(2020) 35% increase NoZuckBuckConties 425,096(2016) 511,506(2020) 20% increase
The 31% that you claimed for None Zuckerbucks counties was actually 20% was flat out wrong and very significant in efforts to try to make your point.
Zuckerbuck vs no Zuckerbuck counties had almost no effect on trump votes Zuckerbuck vs no Zuckerbuck for Biden was a 15% increase in votes which equates to 219,561 votes
Now time to take a step back and let's look at what happened in Georgia. We both saw video of multiple people dropping off multiple ballots in the wee hours of the night at the drop boxes.
There is video evidence in Fulton Co where the vote count was halted and everyone left Then moments later they resume counting without any Republicans present.
Does any of this any of this make you question the results of the election at all?
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 15, 2024 22:40:50 GMT
The top 4 counties you mentioned, Dekalb, Cobb, Gwinnett and Fulton, saw a 15.8% decrease in Republican votes from 2012 to 2016. This swung to a 15.4% increase from 2016 to 2020, a net gain of 31.2 percentage points. Compare this to democrat votes, which went from a 12.6% increase to a 36.2% for a net gain of 23.6 percentage points. You did it again. The study you referred to was between 2016 and 2020. There was nothing within that chart that showed 2012 Numbers yet you inject those numbers to justify your narrative??? Keep in mind that Trump was not even running in 2012.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 15, 2024 16:15:54 GMT
I’m counting on your assessment of non-funded counties in Georgia. Maybe, I shouldn’t ? Money spent in Texas, or California or New Jersey had zero impact on the outcome of the election. That’s just how it is. But, you know that already, don’t you? It’s just there to muddy up the data. I wonder how many lives were saved by this critical COVID protection? The Georgia analysis was only on Democrats, to show your statement was false about democrat votes, that there was “no such increase” in non-Zuckerbucks counties. That’s where it was obvious you were just making blanket statements using your “intelligence guided by experience” rather than actual facts. I specifically mentioned the money spent in California, New Jersey and New York as it was quite a lot, and we agree wouldn’t impact the election. You’re saying it was just a distraction to spend the majority of the money in non-battleground states? Once again you take a statement look at the numbers and manipulate the data in way that fits your agenda. Funded counties vs non funded counties is an extremely biased approach because you are grouping counties that received less the 1 Grant per capitol vs those that have greater than 10 grants per capita. Keep in mind that Zuckerbucks were targeted towards Democrat leaning locations within these counties which you clearly have not taken into consideration. Here are the results of the top 4 counties that Dekalb, Cobb, Gwinnett, and Fulton that all have a democrat majority when in comes to voting. Democrat votes increased by 49% from 2016 to 2020 Republican votes increased by 14% from 2016 to 2020 Demcrat votes increased by 306,000 votes from 2016 to 2020 Republican votes increased by 67,000 votes from 2016 to 2020 Now lets just take a look at the 6 most funded counties the state per capita. This is the four mentioned above including Douglas and Clayton. BTW these are the only 6 counties that received funding that exceeded that average funding per county on a per capita basis. Democrat votes increased by 39% from 2016 to 2020 Republican votes increased by 16% from 2016 to 2020 Demcrat votes increased by 348,000 votes from 2016 to 2020 Republican votes increased by 73,000 votes from 2016 to 2020 Common sense would clearly tell you that these efforts clearly had an impact on the election. By the way your assessment was reckless and flat out wrong but then again that is what you do.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 14, 2024 15:10:12 GMT
As for Zuckerbucks: They were highly effective in turning out more votes for Democrats. In Georgia, there was no such increase in the counties that didn't get the money. There sure was in the ones who did get the money. Once again, I must call you out on your misinformation. Using county results for 2016 and 2020, as well as the data provided in your link: -counties that did not receive grants had 31% more democrat votes in 2020 compared to 2016 -counties that did receive grants had 36% more democrat votes in 2020 compared to 2016 Zuckerbucks efforts were highly focused on to increase votes Democrats. This was done by focusing on efforts in locations that had a vast majority Democrats. So let's take a look at the top 4 counties that Dekalb, Cobb, Gwinnett, and Fulton that all have a democrat majority when in comes to voting. From those counties alone Democrat votes increased by 49% from 2016 to 2020 Republican votes increased by 14% from 2016 to 2020 Demcrat votes increased by 306,000 votes from 2016 to 2020 Republican votes increased by 67,000 votes from 2016 to 2020 Keep in mind that Zuckerbucks efforts were focused primarily on the Democrat pockets within each county. These are also the same counties where there is video evidence of individuals dropping off multiple ballots at a time in the wee hours of the night.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 11, 2024 17:40:37 GMT
None of those are evidence that the election was stolen. Some of those points I don’t even think are true, like counting ballots without signatures. Citation please? When states willingly fail to follow established rules for holding the election, there will always be suspicion when the outcome seems implausible. I erred saying "ballots with no signatures"... It should have been "ballots with no dates". www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mail-in-ballots-must-have-dates-on-envelopes-pennsylvania-appeals-court-rules/ar-BB1kKstzIn 2020, Pennsylvania, in violation of State law, counted mail-in ballots coming in THREE days after election day. Who could possibly abuse that kind of system? Practically no state had a system of signature verification planned for anything like the % of mail-in ballots cast in 2020. They all had to virtually waive their established rules for verification. vashiva.com/scientific-study-reveals-maricopa-counted-200000-ballots-with-mismatched-signatures/ That was the original ruling in 2022. It just got expanded; apnews.com/article/delaware-early-voting-absentee-lawsuit-072bfce3468de4db3b2638ed383cf526I guess the ballots they were using are still OK, but the WAY they conducted the election, as to timing, has been ruled unconstitutional. Zuckerberg’s donations were not found to be illegal, or even politically biased, 6-0 by the bipartisan FEC. LOL The FEC is worse than Inspector Clouseau. Only in America is illegal to give a candidate more than $3,300. But, it's FINE to funnel $491M through shell organizations, and dole it out all over the country, particularly in the critical few swing states, and almost ALL to help Democract turnout. capitalresearch.org/article/shining-a-light-on-zuck-bucks-in-key-states/Note.... Georgia. The state with the HIGHEST per capita grants; CTCL gave grants to 17 of the 31 counties Biden won in Georgia. Together, t hese 17 counties received $42.4 million, or over 94 percent of all CTCL funds in the Peach state. Nothing to see here. Right. Anyone who's EVER worked in a campaign, or in an election, understands well the power of money. Zuckerberg found a loophole, and exploited it. Since 2020, three more states (Alabama, Arizona and Wisconsin) have passed laws, or amended their constitution to specifically BAN what Zuck did. They seemed to think it made a difference. Bevo, I commend your efforts and appreciate your view but when you are dealing with TDS types then all facts and logic will be thrown out the window. EJ Carroll can't remember the year she was raped? Stormy Daniels signed a letter that stated "I am denying this affair because it never happened." The Bank the gave Trump the loan did approve of this loan and stated they would do it again in a heartbeat. Any logical thinker can see that there is a different standard on how Biden and Trump are treated regarding the classified document cases. What Biden did was far worse because he stole classified documents that he had no right to have considering he was not President at the time. Yet after they investigation they let Biden of because of his age and poor memory. Anyone who concludes that there is no evidence of election fraud in 2020 either has their head in the sand or is completely incapable of accepting any facts or information that would lead you to that conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 2, 2024 18:26:32 GMT
I didnt watch, the Reds were on and I've seen enough of Kim Mulkey. Well you certainly did not see here during the Nataional Anthem before the game! Glad to see Iowa put it to Reece and company. Great win for Iowa and Clark did it with class. I don't watch much Womens hoop but I do enjoying watching Clark play. She is not only a great shooter but amazing passer as well.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 2, 2024 17:12:05 GMT
I am 100% against any further expansion. That being said, both Clemson and FSU by far seem to be the most attractive teams from the ACC and B12. Miami would be the next in line. My concern with Clemson is that their attractiveness is based on the last 10 years where they have been elite status. Prior to that I viewed them more as a Mid Tier Big 10 team. It will be interesting to see if they can sustain an elite level porgram moving forward.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Apr 1, 2024 19:52:26 GMT
My favorite city would have to be Key West. Awesome climate, lots of water sports, great restaurants, and the night life with tons of live music is off the charts good. I know some people get turned off by the beaches but they actually aren't that bad. Our favorite thing we did is take a sea plane to the Dry Tortugas National Park. They leave you on the island for a few hours to explore and snorkel.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Feb 26, 2024 21:09:17 GMT
The 4 QB’s to beat all 32 current franchises are Manning, Favre, Brees and Brady. My guess is Rodgers needs to beat the Packers. Manning and Farve were the first 2 that came to mind. Didn't realize Brees played for another team. Brady, Montana, and Esiason were the other 3 that I thought of.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Feb 9, 2024 22:16:57 GMT
traveled after the steel and then took about 2 steps too many at the hoop. Got to love Duke rules.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Feb 8, 2024 20:29:35 GMT
Lary Bird was by far the most entertaining player to watch (at least for me)
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Feb 7, 2024 16:33:21 GMT
I am assuming P5. If so I would go with Vandy. West Virginia never beats anyone good but I think they got K State ranked team in the late teens.
|
|
|
Post by ajbuckeye on Feb 4, 2024 16:47:23 GMT
Unfortunately our main stream media will never show this side of trump.
|
|