|
Post by Bevo on Mar 17, 2023 15:49:51 GMT
I love the way they use this statement to dispel any fear:
"A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines," as CDC puts it on its website."
But at the same time, ANY person who HAD covid when they died was counted as a 'covid death', for the purpose of hyping fear of the diseases. It's totally inconsistent.
Maybe, the difference is... nobody gets extra money from the government for linking a death to a vaccination. For covid, they did.
So.. if the numbers are not reliable, how about doing a little work to show numbers on a relative basis vs normal?
Oh... same way with this.... "4863—represents just 0.0017% of more than 285 million doses of vaccine given"
Never did I see a statement like that showing what a LOW probability any young person has in dying from covid. I calculated them, several times.. they were in the same range. The risk to people under 50 from this disease has ALWAYS been very low. Nothing close to justifying mandatory vaccination with a new, unproven technology.
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Mar 17, 2023 16:25:47 GMT
I did not see the statement in this article about dumb cousin fucking viewers in this article. Where did it come from. I need a source. The source is from a lawsuit by Dominion against Fox News for intentionally misleading viewers because that's what the viewers wanted. www.huffpost.com/entry/tucker-carlson-producer-election-deniers-texts_n_64109a7ee4b0bc5cb64ccabc“Like negotiating with terrorists,” former producer Alex Pfeiffer said in a text, “but especially dumb ones. Cousin fucking types, not saudi [sic] royalty.” You are saying The New York Times is not legit. but you gladly take... vaccineimpact.com.... (a website trying to mimic a legitimate research foundation of vaccineimact.org), as fact and legit? This would be entertaining if it weren't so depressing, this manipulation is happening to so many people. Again... all I wanted was a source for your very concerning statement. If you had any shred of honesty you would simply admit, "Oops, misinterpreted that! My mistake!". But you are too far gone down the rabbit hole. I feel for you and others like you.
|
|
|
Post by aufan on Mar 17, 2023 16:28:15 GMT
I love the way they use this statement to dispel any fear: " A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines," as CDC puts it on its website." But at the same time, ANY person who HAD covid when they died was counted as a 'covid death', for the purpose of hyping fear of the diseases. It's totally inconsistent. Maybe, the difference is... nobody gets extra money from the government for linking a death to a vaccination. For covid, they did. So.. if the numbers are not reliable, how about doing a little work to show numbers on a relative basis vs normal? Oh... same way with this.... " 4863—represents just 0.0017% of more than 285 million doses of vaccine given" Never did I see a statement like that showing what a LOW probability any young person has in dying from covid. I calculated them, several times.. they were in the same range. The risk to people under 50 from this disease has ALWAYS been very low. Nothing close to justifying mandatory vaccination with a new, unproven technology.
While you are scrutinizing articles and data, any comment on ajbuckeye's comment, and the source article he pulled from? Make sure your adblocker and anti-virus is up to date though.
|
|
|
Post by Hero on Mar 17, 2023 19:56:30 GMT
I love the way they use this statement to dispel any fear: " A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines," as CDC puts it on its website." But at the same time, ANY person who HAD covid when they died was counted as a 'covid death', for the purpose of hyping fear of the diseases. It's totally inconsistent. Maybe, the difference is... nobody gets extra money from the government for linking a death to a vaccination. For covid, they did. So.. if the numbers are not reliable, how about doing a little work to show numbers on a relative basis vs normal? Oh... same way with this.... " 4863—represents just 0.0017% of more than 285 million doses of vaccine given" Never did I see a statement like that showing what a LOW probability any young person has in dying from covid. I calculated them, several times.. they were in the same range. The risk to people under 50 from this disease has ALWAYS been very low. Nothing close to justifying mandatory vaccination with a new, unproven technology.
While you are scrutinizing articles and data, any comment on ajbuckeye's comment, and the source article he pulled from? Make sure your adblocker and anti-virus is up to date though.
We are supposed to be careful with AJs posts while you post 5alarmBS from Huffington.
|
|